Using domain-general principles to explain children's causal reasoning abilities.
نویسندگان
چکیده
A connectionist model of causal attribution is presented, emphasizing the use of domain-general principles of processing and learning previously employed in models of semantic cognition. The model categorizes objects dependent upon their observed 'causal properties' and is capable of making several types of inferences that 4-year-old children have been shown to be capable of. The model gives rise to approximate conformity to normative models of causal inference and gives approximate estimates of the probability that an object presented in an ambiguous situation actually possesses a particular causal power, based on background knowledge and recent observations. It accounts for data from three sets of experimental studies of the causal inferencing abilities of young children. The model provides a base for further efforts to delineate the intuitive mechanisms of causal inference employed by children and adults, without appealing to inherent principles or mechanisms specialized for causal as opposed to other forms of reasoning.
منابع مشابه
Pretense, Counterfactuals, and Bayesian Causal Models: Why What Is Not Real Really Matters
Young children spend a large portion of their time pretending about non-real situations. Why? We answer this question by using the framework of Bayesian causal models to argue that pretending and counterfactual reasoning engage the same component cognitive abilities: disengaging with current reality, making inferences about an alternative representation of reality, and keeping this representati...
متن کاملDomain-Specific Causal Knowledge and Children’s Reasoning about Possibility
Before children enter elementary school, they appear capable of making predictions about causal relations in the physical (e.g. Bullock, Gelman, & Baillargeon, 1982), psychological (e.g. Wellman, 1990), and biological (e.g. Inagaki & Hatano, 1993) domains. Young children can also generate explanations of observed events across these domains as well (e.g. Schult & Wellman, 1997; Shultz, 1982; We...
متن کاملCausal Default Reasoning: Principles and Algorithms
The minimal model semantics is a natural interpretation of defaults yet it often yields a behavior that is too weak. This weakness has been traced to the inabiity of minimal models to reflect certain implicit preferences among defaults, in particular, preferences for defaults grounded on more ‘specific’ information and preferences arising in causal domains. Recently, ‘specificity’ preferences h...
متن کاملPreschool physics: Using the invisible property of weight in causal reasoning tasks
Causal reasoning is an important aspect of scientific thinking. Even young human children can use causal reasoning to explain observations, make predictions, and design actions to bring about specific outcomes in the physical world. Weight is an interesting type of cause because it is an invisible property. Here, we tested preschool children with causal problem-solving tasks that assessed their...
متن کاملSyntactic principles of heuristic-driven theory projection
Analogy making is a central construct in human cognition and plays an important role to explain cognitive abilities. While various psychologically or neurally inspired theories for analogical reasoning have been proposed, there is a lack of a logical foundation for analogical reasoning in arti cial intelligence and cognitive science. We aim to close this gap and propose Heuristic-Driven Theory ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Developmental science
دوره 10 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007